"McLaren would no doubt agree with the criticisms in this book of modernity's programmatic, technique-oriented, consumer-driven, and individualistic influence on the church. Having been reared in similar backgrounds, we share a common reaction against mere assertions and slogans and the often unreflective, unquestioning dogmatism that assumes that we have all the answers and everyone else is wrong. I share his interest in the wider horizon of the kingdom of God for our theology and his concern that the gospel is often reduced to a quasi-Gnostic promise of saving the soul (i.e., "going to heaven when we die") rather than ultimately, in the words of the Apostles' Creed, "the resurrection of the body and the life everlasting," which includes the whole creation. This leads to a world-affirming, world-embracing kind of Christianity rather than to a merely negative, reactionary, and reductionistic piety.
"However, I encountered this "new" paradigm by stumbling into Reformed Christianity. It was from this tradition that I learned that questions were good and that sometimes "I don't know" is the right answer; that the Bible is not simply about "me and my personal relationship with Jesus" or merely a doctrinal or moral textbook but a story in which we find ourselves--and the whole creation of which we are a part. In addition to being overwhelmed by God's amazing grace, I was also given a new sense of being called into a communion of saints and a new rationale for responsibility in the world--not to save it, but to love and serve my neighbors and to be a steward of a creation that will be renewed rather than to be simply a consumer of a creation that will be destroyed.
"However, McLaren seems never to have found an alternative kind of evangelical faith to the more pietistic and legalistic background in which he was raised. When he recoils from the doctrine of Christ's atoning death as bearing God's righteous judgment in our place (i.e., penal substitution), I know the distortion he is reacting against. Yet it was a wise and elderly systematic theologian at the seminary where I now teach who warned us never to present this precious truth as if a vengeful Father was taking out his anger on his Son. Rather, he instructed us from the relevant passages, the Father gave his Son because of his love, and the Son was not a victim but a willing substitute who gave himself in love as well." (Michael Horton, Christless Christianity, chapter 4; don't know the page number because I am reading it on my Kindle)
